SciFi Q of the Day: Natural vs Technological Telepathy

patrick-stewart-professor-x-x-men-days-of-future-pastSciFi Question of the Day: Which is more plausible, telepathy that comes about as a natural development in homo sapiens, or telepathy that is created via technology?

Facebook Answers:

  Barry Gavin Short term technology – long term long after our current “civilisation” falls into tales and history books evolution  

  Kelly Jamieson Pg Forte

  Dede Pazour I hope, neither. My unvoiced thoughts are the only things that are safe from the NSA, and I’d like to keep it that way. The space between my ears is a no-fly zone! 

  Zoee Attorelli first one.  

  Clive Hanuschak I think that innate esper ability could be augmented with technology. Where do I sign up?!!  

  Renee McKinley Natural development. As is already the case  

  Gwendolyn Wilkins I think both will come to pass, but the latter will happen first

Google Plus Answers, Speculative Fiction Writers Community:

  Matthew Graybosch  The latter. All you need is IM on implanted computers. It’s what I do in +Starbreaker, along with IRC. All of it’s wrapped in SSH for encrypted comms.

  Matthew Stephens  Technology. Definitely. We already have instant wireless communication and implantable hardware. We’re already making prosthesis that respond to thought waves. All we need now is a much better interface.

  Zachary Besterfield  Technology that can only be used by the most hyper-emphatic and mildly schizophrenic people. Some people have successfully induced schizophrenia in order to exploit the technology. To date, there is still no know way to induce empathy, though eugenics programs have proven viable.

Google Plus Answers, Science Fiction Community:

  Cate C  Via technology

  Andy Hainline  I would say “technology,” simply because evolution always has a specific reason for doing things the way that it does . . . and right now, there isn’t any real survival benefit to telepathy (in fact, I can see being telepathic as hurting your chances of survival, because you’d have to learn how to tune out others’ thoughts through force of will, an unnecessary step that others don’t have to go through).  But with technology?  Hell, with technology, almost anything is possible.  So I vote for that.

  Cate C  Yeah

  William Kelley  You also need to keep in mind the amount of energy that would be needed for evolutionary based telepathy.. Humans intake of sustenance is done at such a high amount mostly to keep our already taxed brains running correctly.. Add on a function that would constantly beam every thought of yours out of your body via some form of radio/long range brain wave and you are going to need a lot more power.

  Cate C  Yes, that is a good point.

  Liam Anderson  The timescale also plays a part. Google might develop “telepathy” as a screenless interface in a decade or so, biological telepathy would require several thousand years. Evolutionary benefits? The human race is reaching the point that the competitive spirit which took it to the top will kill it, and technology is restricted to those who can pay for it. Natural and total telepathy which could not be switched off would have a transformational effect on society. No privacy and no secrets. The ultimate empathy. A murderer would ecperience his victim’s death. Governments would not have secrets and could not silence anyone. There would be no innocence. Everyone would have access to the sexual content of everyone”s brain at all times. If this happened to the human race, our entire culture would have to be restructured from the ground up.

  Liam Anderson  I’m on a roll here! Think what it would do to negotiation! How could you do a deal when you know what the other person is thinking and they know what you are thinking? Intellectual property would be irrelevant. The knowledge to create anythibg would be freely available. The internet and social networks would be obsolete, as would communications technology.

  Jay J  I think technology. But “telepathy” is a very broad word.

  Cate C  Jay J, I completely agree

  Alex Cake  Technology could achieve this exceedingly easily, on varying scales.

  Stefon Mears  Either can be plausible. Go with whichever works better for the story.

   Phil Friel  Anyone who is interested in the subject of telepathy really, really should read Alfred Bester’s THE DEMOLISHED MAN. It’s the best portrayal I’ve ever read of telepathy in a human-based society (Earth).

  Andy Hainline  Another excellent portrayal of telepaths and humans coexisting (or not doing such a good job of it) is J. Michael Sraczynski’s wonderful sci-fi show, Babylon 5, which features a race o human telepaths living side-by-side with humanity on Earth.  And the best part?  One of the top operatives of the “Psi Corps” is named . . .Alfred Bester.  😛

  Stefon Mears  Both The Demolished Man and Babylon 5 have excellent depictions of telepathy. I would also suggest Octavia Butler’s Patternmaster books.

(I’m also please with the way I’ve done it in my upcoming novel, but this isn’t the place to talk about that.)

  Phil Friel  As Andy says, there was also Babylon 5, one of my all-time favourite telefantasy series. The evil Psi Corps in this were the dark mirror image of the benevolent Telepath’s Guild in THE DEMOLISHED MAN. Joe Straczynski was always a huge fan of Bester’s work, and this was a major tribute to one of the SF favourites of his youth.

Another old telepath favourite of mine was A. E. van Vogt’s SLAN, which was published around the same time as THE DEMOLISHED MAN (circa 1950?). SLAN was probably the prototype for almost every modern “homo superior persecuted by homo sapiens” work in SF, sci-fi TV and cinema and comics. I loved that novel, and must’ve read it a dozen times back in my late teens. Time for a re-read, methinks.

Google Plus Answers, Public Post:

  Nico Paloceropalo  2nd one is already in development

  David Foster  I am going to go with technology as well. Radio waves are easy. It is just the brain interface that is tricky.

  AmyBeth Inverness  If we had both, I wonder if they’d be compatible?

  Lee Lyte  First one already exists. Not really accepted so I see technology gets the nod.

  Nico Paloceropalo  who read minds?

  Eoghann Irving  If you’re talking telepathy purely in the sense of communicating then we’re practically there already with technology.

  James A Woods  I read somewhere that the electrical output required is greater than the human heart can handle. Gotta go with tech.

  Cate Russell-Cole  Natural

SciFi Q of the Day 2013

Advertisements

About AmyBeth Inverness

A writer by birth, a redhead by choice.
This entry was posted in SciFi Q of the Day and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to SciFi Q of the Day: Natural vs Technological Telepathy

  1. ariishaa says:

    So, you are talking about telepathy as described in books, and here is a true story about the telepathy contact. One can read about it on the site AbuseInTelepathyChannel.FreeForums.org. I am not a writer of fiction, I am writing about my experience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s