SciFi Q of the Day: Convicts or Corporations?

Location, Location, Location

SciFi Question of the Day: If you were planning a new planetary colony, but were short on funds, which would be preferable: Accepting ex-cons willing to pay triple what the other colonists are contributing, or ceding 51% of your colony’s interest to a corporate sponsor?

Facebook Answers

  Geri Bressler I’d trust ex-cons over a corporation any day and twice on Sunday

  Robert B. Fredricksen Lets see, you have one group that would kill with out a second thought for your and your loved ones money. And then there are ex-cons who have served thier time and are looking for a place to fit in and will work hard to get the job done. I’m with Geri on this one.

  Gawain Ouronos ex-cons of course; at least they (ideally) are trying to restart their lives without the burden of their status. This is a perfect way for them to “start over”.

I wouldn’t even cede 1% of the colony’s interest to a corporate sponsor if I could. Especially since if, for some reason, it would be advantageous for the corporation to not have you there any longer…

  Christopher Dorda That’s simple! What do you want in 29 years? Australia or the USA?

  Daniel Beard Corporate sponsor. so long as their representative can easily be given a long walk out of a small airlock.

  Gwendolyn Wilkins I’d take the ex-cons so long as I could screen them first.

Google Plus Answers:

  Miaka Kirino  I’d rather accept the ex-cons, though I’d make sure to carefully vet them, and add a stipulation to their contract that if they committed major crimes again they’d be jailed and loose their rights to whatever share of the colony they owned.

  Timothy Lake  It seems to me you have the same result: well-heeled criminals influencing your society, or well-heeled criminals influencing your society.

Truthfully, if I were telling the story, I’d take the ex-cons. There’s a great back-story in there. How did they get enough to contribute so much more than honest citizens? Are they secretly still criminals?

  Timothy Lake  oooh Oooh!! How about corporate-sponsored criminals?

Right. Sorry – this is supposed to be fiction, huh? 😉

  Caz Abbott  I’ll take the ex cons as long as they’re not violent offenders.

I would love to hear what you think! Even if you are reading this post a year or more after publishing, I hope you will leave a comment with your own ideas on this topic.

The previous SciFi Q of the Day is Restricting Voting Rights

The shortlink for this post is http://wp.me/p1qnT4-Uk

The next SciFi Q of the Day is The Mayans Were Right

Advertisements

About AmyBeth Inverness

A writer by birth, a redhead by choice.
This entry was posted in Interviews and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to SciFi Q of the Day: Convicts or Corporations?

  1. Pingback: SciFi Q of the Day: Restricting Voting Rights | AmyBeth Inverness

  2. After having a completely random, paranormalesque adventure that took you out of your ho-hum existence for the weekend, you’ve told your story and sold the film rights. Unfortunately, the producers won’t let you play yourself. Who should play you in the made-for-SyFy movie?

  3. Which Mythbuster would be best suited to work for Torchwood?

  4. If you could afford one large SciFi prop/decoration for your home or yard, what would you choose? What would your family think?

  5. Pingback: SciFi Question of the Day: The Mayans Were Right | AmyBeth Inverness

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s