Have you ever put a significant amount of work into a project just to discover that, somewhere along the line, you took a wrong turn and need to reset everything back to the way it was?
I had at least one student do that today during their final exam. They had to take an Access database and perform a list of additions and modifications. If you’re not familiar with MS Access, it is often truly simpler and easier to restart than it is to fix whatever mess you’ve created.
I spent April on blog hiatus. I attended my first writer’s conference (about which I’ve already blogged and will blog some more) It’s been just over two years of writing seriously with intent to create a career, and I have several small pieces published.
I don’t need to reset to an earlier status, but I do need to set myself in some direction that has purpose and makes sense. I’ve been going—not in the wrong direction—but in too many directions. I went from working steadily on my novels to chasing short stories and back to the novels again. I was kermit-flailing all over, and not necessarily in a good way.Kermit Flail
The one big certainty is that I must submit. It’s not as important what I submit as it is important that I do submit, preferably frequently. I need to collect rejection slips (Lord help me, I have a thin skin…) and put myself out there more.
What I’m not so certain about is exactly how to divide my energies. Tuesday was the end of the semester for me, so I’m done teaching for now. In September it gets even better because I don’t usually teach in the fall semester and my youngest child will finally be in all-day kindergarten. I will have more discretionary time.
I have both short stories and novels to work on.
I need and want to get my Pangalactic Sojourners series (5 books) out there. Firstly, it means a lot to me that there be Quiltbag Christian Romance written as simply sweet, maybe just a little steamy, stories of two people of faith falling in love. Secondly, an editor expressed interest, and that is a HUGE impetus for a writer to finish. Yes…finish. I’ve almost finished book one and I’ve written a significant portion of book two. I have books three, four, and five roughly outlined.
Short stories are still a good idea. For one thing, I can write a short in just one night, or a few nights for the longer works. I’ve found that the markets are much more numerous than I originally thought. If I send out twenty stories and only one is accepted—huzzah!—I have an acceptance!
I’ve definitely grown and improved as a writer in the last couple of years. But I still have trouble differentiating between my own diva-behavior and genuine needs. Uninterrupted time is invaluable. But does that mean I shouldn’t even bother trying to write if I know I’ll be interrupted? Sometimes yes. Sometimes it ends in tears and frustration if I try to force my way through. I’ve listened to other writers describe their writing habits. Some, when working on a novel, push hard and get the first draft out in as short as time as possible; a few weeks or months. This appeals to me, and I think it will work well. But is it practical? I won’t know until I try.
The remaining question is with my Steampunk stories. Admittedly, they’re foremost in my brain at the moment. I used the first page of Give Me Your Answer Do (my Steampunk Mermaid story) as my sample for critique at the conference. What it has going for it: it is finished (the first draft) and it is fun! And quite a few of my friends and followers would love to see it published. What it has going against it is that the anthology I thought I would submit it to may not be the right fit after all. Namely, it is too long. I am able to cut the story back, and I’ve done so, but it is more appropriate for this story to be around 10k. The other thing against it is that I have not read nearly as much Steampunk as I should before I can believe my own story is true to the genre.
So…I’m still figuring out how to divide my concentration between the Steampunk novellas, the Pangalactic Sojourners, and the shorts. I might try spending a few days a week on the novels, and a few on the shorts. I may put aside the novels until I can dedicate a few solid work weeks to them. I don’t know.
With the blog, there will definitely be some differences. I have been doing a SciFi Question of the day post every Tuesday, a ROW80 update every Wednesday, and an interview every Friday. I’ve been trying to add to the Pangalactic Sojourners Blog regularly, but that hasn’t happened lately. I am going to cut back a little because I’ve been spending too many hours on the blog and I need to spend more on actual writing. I will do either an interview or a SciFi Question of the Day post every Friday. Some of my best writer-relationships have grown from the interviews, so I’ll keep that up. The SciFi Question of the Day posts aren’t very popular, however the original questions on social media are very popular. I’ll definitely keep those up. I’ll still post an update every Wednesday, and I may add the occasional rambling post on some other topic. One thing I will add is to post more frequently in the Pangalactic Sojourners Blog. This is the time in which the stories theoretically take place, and the blog will be a great bonus-feature to the books someday.
I haven’t officially jumped into this Round of Words in 80 Days. I’m still not sure what my tangible goals are going to be. Check back next Wednesday… I’ll let you know.





SciFi Question of the Day: Switch any two canines (live or robotic) from two different SciFi shows. What happens?


















SciFi Question of the Day: Which would be a greater benefit to humanity as a whole? For all humans to have touch telepathy, or for all humans to have regional empathy?
















































Following Directions
Then I read a blog post by the contest sponsor DeAnna Knippling about not entering her own contest. She did, however, write a story for it, and found a venue.
The venue was one of the parts that I was sure would take me hours and hours to find. Seeing that she’d found one, I looked at it and decided that I would attempt the contest after all, even though I only had five hours left. (Three, if I wanted to get to bed by midnight. I took four and a half.) I copied the contest’s guidelines and the venue’s submission guidelines into a new document, and started writing.
I enjoy flash fiction, and I know that sometimes what comes out is crap, but every once in a while what comes out is positively inspired. This story felt like flash fiction, with such a short time to write it. What came out was pretty good. Not my best, not something I’d get excited about, but cute in a way that almost tempted me to dig out my children’s book pseudonym for submittal (I didn’t. I stuck with Inverness.) I read it out loud once and fixed a few little things, then checked the submission guidelines again so I knew exactly what font and formatting and information the publisher wanted.
This is where I apparently excel. In fact, I often stress far more over whether I did everything in the submission process just right than I do over the story itself. Yet I do hear stories from agents and publishers alike about scores of submissions being discarded simply because the writer didn’t follow directions. Sometimes this is nit-picking, such as using Ariel font instead of Times New Roman. However it is often some more important detail, such as sending to an agent who does not represent the genre written. Missing a deadline is also a big problem. It’s bad enough to miss a deadline when you already have a relationship or even a contract with a publisher, but to miss a deadline when it is your first introduction to the publisher is unprofessional at least. Far better to simply tell oneself “Oops, I missed that opportunity,” and not submit at all instead of having one’s initial contact with the publisher be so rude.
I submitted my story Something Borrowed, Something Blue to both the publisher and to the contest. A few days later, I found out that I’d won!
I was curious as to how many writers had entered. It was, after all, a tight deadline. You can read DeAnna’s breakdown of how many entries there were (ten) and how many of those entries failed to meet the guidelines in some way (seven) leaving only three.
I was surprised… not at the small numbers of entrants, but at the overwhelming percentage (more than half?) that missed some aspect of the instructions. Granted, DeAnna herself mentioned that she should have been clearer. I was confused the first time I read them, and so I asked her to clarify. Also, some entrants probably sent something just for fun, not really intended to compete or to submit to an actual publisher.
I asked around, and it seems that I’m safe in saying that well over half of submissions in general don’t follow 100% of the instructions. The actual number may be closer to 70% or 80% or more that don’t get it exactly right. Sure, some writers might not be as conscientious as they should about making sure they’ve done everything exactly as instructed, but there are also problems with instructions being outdated or unclear. Some authors miss some detail on purpose because they are hoping the agent or publisher will make an exception for them, such as submitting something slightly over or under the word count.
This is encouraging to me. One thing I learned at the conference is that I should be submitting much more than I have. Although I still intend to get my novels polished and ready for that just-right venue, I can do more short stories. I’ve learned that there are more than enough calls for submissions out there. I simply need to pick the right ones and stay organized about what I’ve sent and to whom. Oh…that reminds me… DeAnna also suggested a submission tracking website for authors. I think I’ll look into that too!
So now… time to go look at Deserae, and send her off to Book Lovers, then I’ll check Inkstained Succubus and see if there’s a call or two that fits what stories I have in the back of my mind.
Wish me luck.